Are two heads better than one? Mahmood Reza explains why and how arts organisations can merge to ensure survival and success

A face on two hands

There is a history of collaborative working within the arts sector, ranging from sharing resources to project working. But how and why might a formal merger between arts organisations work? It’s a timely consideration, as management teams are looking to find better ways of working together. Topical additional pressures – namely the current economic climate and anticipated outcome of the spending review – will probably mean that mergers become a more common strategic option for organisations considering legitimate and workable plans to improve their capability. The Minister for Culture, Ed Vaizey, stated earlier this year that “there might be scope to strengthen the sector by more co-ordination or possibly mergers”. The subject of mergers was also on the agenda at the first Culture Forum meeting over the summer.


Mergers can produce a number of benefits for organisations and their beneficiaries, as well as a number of challenges. Some of the more commonly quoted positives include more effective management; risk reduction; economies of scale; improved service delivery; increased organisational profile; additional income sources and increased capacity. The process will involve an initial consideration of the merger, a due diligence exercise, and managing the merger, a process that is sometimes referred to as ‘change management’.

The first stage will include the preparation of the business case for merger, to decide if it is the right strategic option for those involved. Some of the many other issues to be evaluated include compatibility of organisational vision, values and mission; risks and impact; compatibility of the respective constitutions and governing documents; choice of legal structure and the new name for the entity; selection and choice of trustees, management and staff; incompatibility of IT systems; required resources and required consent if a members organisation.


Mergers can expose organisations to additional liabilities but an effective due diligence exercise can identify risks prior to any formal merger agreement. Because of the sensitivity of the information that will be disclosed, it is normal practice for all parties to have formal confidentiality agreements in place – these will be especially important if the proposed merger does not proceed. A due diligence exercise should be carried out as soon as the principle for a merger has been agreed.

The areas covered by a due diligence exercise will be financial, legal and organisational. Financial due diligence will examine, amongst other matters, an organisation’s financial health; its reporting systems; security and stability of funding; liabilities and covenants; pension schemes; insurance cover and accounting policies. Legal due diligence should cover powers within governing documents; nature and form of new organisation; existing contracts; selection and appointment of trustees. Organisational due diligence will likely examine the rationale for a merger; positional analysis and compatibility of IT systems and culture.


Strategic change tends to create anxiety and concern amongst stakeholders, including employees, management, client groups, funders and trustees. Individuals influence strategy through their behaviour and competence. A number of the problems that arise from managing change result from a failure to understand, address and alter behaviour. At the start of the process effective communication and involvement with all stakeholders is critical; transparency, openness, trust and integrity needs to be at the heart of the merger process. The directors/trustees and senior management team need to all agree that the merger is the best strategic choice. There will be a level of fear and concerns over the proposal, which will include of a loss of autonomy and identity, job security and loss of status. Open and frank discussions at an early stage are crucial; this helps clarify misunderstandings, maintain motivation, minimises worry and contributes to an organisation that will be fitter for purpose.

If a merger is to go ahead it is accepted practice to appoint the Chief Executive of the merged organisation at an early stage. This will provide focus and clarity to the leadership of the organisation. Obviously this recruitment and selection process should be open, transparent and fair. Another decision to be made is the involvement of external advisors in the merger process. There is plenty of expertise and talent (latent or otherwise) within arts organisations to lead and involve themselves in the process, for example in the preparation of the business case and evaluation of the due diligence documentation. External advisors have their part to play in the management and facilitation of some aspects of the merger process, for example in change management, risk and financial analysis. The option of forming a merger will become more feasible if there is a good business case and the process is handled correctly. On completion, it should mean organisational capability and strength will improve.

Mahmood Reza is Proprietor of Pro Active Resolutions.
T: 0116 224 7122

Link to Author(s): 
Image of Mahmood Reza