• Share on Facebook
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by email
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by email

We accept income as a strong predictor of cultural taste. But why should this be, asks sociologist Aaron Reeves. And does taste matter as much as actual participation? 

Students in beautiful library

Cultural tastes and practices vary among people in different social positions. But this variation is not random. There is some regularity to patterns of cultural taste and practice across the social strata. Three possible explanations exist.

Attending university may enable someone to move into a more advantaged social position, and education may also affect cultural tastes. University graduates may be more likely to listen to classical music than non-graduates because they have been exposed to it and to other people who like it.

government policy is currently concerned with encouraging arts participation, but policies are often based on research examining patterns of taste and not patterns of practice

Social class is associated with income and income may provide people with the freedom to enjoy the cultural arts.

A final explanation is social status. High-status occupations increase the likelihood that people enjoy highbrow cultural activities because other people in those high-status occupations also enjoy those activities. That is, cultural taste moves through friendship networks and so people who move into advantaged social positions will become more like their peers in terms of their cultural tastes.

To date, education and social status appear to explain most of the association between cultural tastes and social position. Social class and income seem to be less important.

Cultural tastes, practices and participation

Cultural practices are different. They are not quite like cultural tastes. Saying that you like classical music is not the same as going to a concert hall to hear Beethoven’s seventh symphony.

Participating in the arts requires more time and money than expressing a cultural taste. Moreover, participating in the arts can involve entering into public spaces that have unfamiliar codes of conduct or esoteric modes of communication that can make the uninitiated feel ill at ease.

Cultural practices are not cultural tastes because the barriers to participating in the arts are quite different from the barriers to talking about cultural tastes.

So, although education and social status explain cultural tastes, do they also explain cultural participation?

To answer this question, I examined data on cultural participation, income, social class, education and social status from around 70,000 people. Education remains the strongest predictor of cultural participation, while social status and social class are not as clearly associated.

This is important because government policy is currently concerned with encouraging arts participation, but policies are often based on research examining patterns of taste and not patterns of practice. This may be useful (and necessary) in some cases but it can also lead to mistakes. My research suggests that tastes and practices are not the same and that predictors of one are not necessarily predictors of the other.

Income and cultural taste

But there are still important questions that remain unexplored in this area. Although cultural tastes and income are correlated, it does not explain why. That is, it does not explain the mechanism or process through which this association is generated.

Cultural tastes and income could be correlated because people with high incomes are friends and become more similar over time. In this perspective, Jane may get a new high-paying job and over time change her cultural tastes, becoming more similar to her colleagues. But cultural tastes and income could be correlated because cultural tastes are used as a criteria when deciding whether Jane will get that new high-paying job or not.

This process matters because if cultural tastes are used as a criteria to determine access to high-pay occupations, then this may be one mechanism through which inequalities are reproduced because people with the ‘right’ cultural tastes are more likely to come from more affluent backgrounds.

To some, this cultural reproduction of inequality may seem far-fetched but evidence from both the US and the UK suggests that cultural tastes are being used as criteria to determine entry into high-pay occupations.

This is an important next step in this research agenda. To examine not just the inequalities in cultural practice across society, but to also explain how those inequalities are generated and whether they disadvantage particular groups, constraining their ability to be upwardly mobile in society.

Aaron Reeves is Senior Research Fellow in the Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.

Comment from Deborah Bull

Understanding why a strong correlation between cultural tastes and income exists is one step on the road to better understanding how the cultural industries can increase access and opportunity for all, a key theme of Ed Vaizey’s recently published, and long awaited, Culture White Paper.

Aaron’s work presents a real conundrum for policy-makers about the types of mechanisms that can actually broaden access to the sorts of arts and culture supported through public funding. His contribution also stresses that increasing participation and increasing attendance require very different sets of tools.

Jennie Lee’s ‘The First Steps’, the original Culture White Paper, produced just over half a century ago, highlights the very same issues surrounding inequality of access. There has been much change and some improvement since then – very possibly because of Lee’s work – and yet the issue of ‘reproduction of inequality’ is still one with which the sector struggles.

Jude Kelly, Artistic Director of the Southbank Centre, succinctly summed it up at the launch of the new White Paper when she reminded us: “Inclusion doesn’t mean ‘I’m standing in the middle, come join me’ – you have to stand in a different place.”

Deborah Bull is Assistant Principal, King’s College London.

This article is a summary of research prepared for CultureCase, a new resource from King’s College London to provide the sector with access to academic standard research. The summary of Aaron Reeves’ academic paper is available on CultureCase.

Link to Author(s): 
Aaron Reeves
Photo of Deborah Bull