• Share on Facebook
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by email
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by email

After the economic shock of Covid-19, Susan Jones unpicks the issues surrounding traditional arts policymaking and calls for more art-friendly business models.

Contemporary Visual Arts Network’s policy commitment to strategic action, to ensure an equitable sector precipitated by the shocking context of Black Lives Matter, is timely in a pandemic world which has laid bare the systemic social and economic fault lines in the arts. This England-wide network’s report last year into the immediate impacts of Covid-19 confirmed that the divergent social realities and artistic ambitions of under-represented and marginalised practitioners – who along with those with invisible disabilities including autism, ADHD and bi-polarity are over-represented within the arts constituency – are currently under-supported by contemporary visual arts infrastructures.

But the processes of devising and activating strategies to combat and excise exclusion of all kinds in the arts move at a glacial pace. That’s because ultimate ownership lies with the Arts Council as the national arm’s-length arts funded agency for England, which passes responsibility down to the chosen portfolio of arts institutions where it’s positioned in the territory of ‘arts leaders’ rather than being individually-held. Remedial measures are made manifest and delivered in bite-sized, readily-measured multi-year institutional operational plans, which are structurally over-dependent on sustained public funding and the largesse of freelancers... Keep reading on The Double Negative.