• Share on Facebook
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by email
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by email

Those calling for a ‘Town of Culture’ award to sit alongside the UK’s existing scheme for cities are right to recognise the transformative power of the arts. But the debate needs to be part of a wider conversation about how to make sure cultural intervention has the broadest possible impact, says Phil Redmond.

Another year over, a new one just begun, sang one of Liverpool’s great songsmiths. And with each one that passes, a new anniversary is formed. Last year was significant for me, as it was not just the 40th anniversary of Grange Hill but also the 10th anniversary of what will, probably, soon be known as England’s one and only European capital of culture.
This year will mark a decade since, having seen the impact on Liverpool, I suggested and began shepherding the UK city of culture project. Last week the Labour MP Yvette Cooper suggested there should be a town of culture award to sit alongside it.
She was right to identify culture’s catalytic effect. Such titles encourage people to come together collaboratively, using culture to explore common interests and opportunities for change.
But these awards are not a panacea...Keep reading on The Guardian