• Share on Facebook
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by email
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by email

The University of Bath – a university that offers no arts courses – recently launched a new arts venue, but its artists in residence programme has been reaching out to staff, students and the local population for years, says John Struthers.

Photo of artist and printing press
Barry Sykes, artist-in-residence, uses the university printing press

The Institute of Contemporary Interdisciplinary Arts (ICIA) at the University of Bath was officially launched in May to create a space on campus where audiences from across the region can come together with artists, scholars and students to explore contemporary arts and ideas. The university has invested £11m in the new arts venue called The Edge. It has three white cube galleries, a theatre, music practice rooms and performance studios, and is shared with the School of Management.

Vice-Chancellor, Professor Dame Glynis Breakwell, says of the new venue: “Bringing the creative arts and the study of management together under one roof is a new departure for Bath. Our aim is that this will foster a culture of creativity and innovation, add greater depth to our management programmes and promote leadership development and innovative business practice in the arts.”

It’s becoming increasingly important that arts venues within universities assert the unique value of their cultural offer and overcome challenges such as institutional anonymity

The challenges to promote art programmes within this context are many, such as successfully cultivating an ever-changing student audience and convincing academic colleagues to ‘buy in’ and champion our value.

Presently (and largely thanks to university funding) we operate from a position of relative security compared to other arts organisations. However, with all arts organisations reviewing their funding and renewing efforts to achieve long-term sustainability, it’s becoming increasingly important that arts venues within universities assert the value of their cultural offer and overcome challenges such as institutional anonymity.

A strand of our work that brings benefits all-round is our artists-in-residence programme. Artists are supported in the development of their practice and are given access to the campus and academic departments. Through our offering of time, support and freedom, artists undertake a period of research and development, experimenting with new ideas or projects, engaging with audiences and taking risks. It is sometimes difficult for artists to have the resources for open-ended research, so this approach enables them to develo p new ideas without the constraints of a definitive outcome. This opens up a process that is rarely visible and we therefore encourage alternative ways for audiences to engage.

Our most recent artist-in-residence, visual artist Barry Sykes, comments: “I had a completely open brief and realised early on that I wanted the campus to be the potential subject matter. The knowledge, research and expertise here is immense and unfathomable. I didn’t have a base so I knocked on doors and wandered round the campus. As a sculptor I was curious about the potential of all those rooms that are structurally very similar, but entirely different because of what’s housed within them – there’s the library, archives, wind tunnel, concrete labs, metrology research, testing rooms, Dojo, an Oympic-sized swimming pool, the plant room, greenhouses and all sorts of labs and lecture rooms. It felt so potent.”

Barry’s 18-month residency saw many projects to fruition, including a project with sociology students around sculpting answers to questions about how students feel, and a final exhibition including a ‘blind sculpture’. Barry asked a lab support technician in engineering and design to recreate a sculpture he saw over ten years ago, writing a brief from memory and emailing it to him. As well as giving the university new insights into the departments and campus locations that Barry explored, his work was seen by audiences he might not otherwise have reached among the student and staff population, alongside local contemporary arts audiences. And Barry’s work brings members of the local community on to the campus who may not otherwise engage with their local university, which is a big presence in the small town of Bath.

Music artist-in-residence, violinist and composer Alexander Balanescu created original works following a time collaborating with the Department of Politics, Languages and International studies. The resulting composition was inspired by the patterns of melodies and language. His residency explored the idea that we all operate in a multilingual environment, even if we do not speak or understand multiple languages. Throughout the project, students, staff and audiences engaged with each other in different ways, crossing the boundaries of language and music and gaining new insights into their respective disciplines and perception of spoken and musical language.

Going forward, we are working to expand the artist residency programme, using other more lucrative strands to support it. This artist residency link is essential to the continued relationship between us and the university, providing a two-way street for both organisations, plus unparalleled opportunities for artists to develop their practice within an academic and research environment.

John Struthers is Director of ICIA at the University of Bath.
www.icia.org.uk

Link to Author(s): 
Photo of John Struthers

Comments

The Barry Sykes project sounds fantastic, but it is common knowledge within the arts sector that the university very recently made redundant the three highly qualified and skilled creative producers for music, theatre and visual arts because of a change in artistic direction. A change that is moving away from supporting artists and commissioning, so how can they propose to expand the artist in residence programme when they have got rid of the artistic producers? From my understanding it was these producers that provided much needed expertise and support for artists during these residencies. Universities should whole heartedly 'assert their unique cultural offer', but they need the right expertise in place to support that offer.

I am struggling with this article written by John Struthers. I fail to see any correlation between what is written here and what has happened recently at ICIA at the University of Bath. The statement 'we operate from a position of relative security compared to other arts organisations' sits very uncomfortably alongside the fact that all three creative producers were sacked just prior to 'The Edge' opening! This article also seems to draw massively on the work that those creative producers put in prior to being sacked! Barry Sykes' residency was as a direct result of the creative producer for visual arts... who the University of Bath have just laid off due to a 'change of direction'... now here they are shouting about how great it is! In the same vein Alexander Balanescu was championed by the creative producer for music... also sacked at the same time for the same reason! I personally went to see two performances booked by the creative producer for theatre and dance just prior to the official opening of The Edge. Both were fantastic, unexpected and enlightening. So what has become of this producer? You guessed it... sacked! Quite frankly, this article stinks of hypocrisy. I imagine the very words have been stolen from the mouths of the persons made redundant in an attempt to claw back some sort of credibility for ICIA and their appalling behaviour in sacking the very people responsible for bringing them this far. Glynis Breakwell is quite right in saying that this is a departure... far too much of a departure for the University of Bath to handle maybe? So despite the fact that they are in a fantastic position to nurture creativity and become a leading light in the Arts, instead they are hedging their bets and labelling the new ICIA aims as "adding greater depth to our management programmes and promoting leadership development and innovative business practice in the arts.” So, read between the lines... The University of Bath is all about the money. And any sort of creativity must be profitable and measurable, which obviously contrasts with what Struthers states above. Personally I am watching with great interest what ICIA's programme will bring in 2016... unnervingly the upcoming Alan Cotton show stretches the definition of 'contemporary' in my opinion and doesn't bode well for starters. I hope my fears regarding ICIA prove unfounded. But I fear Struthers will fall far short of the pioneering legacy put in place by his former staff.

I would like to comment on the article from the perspective of an artist who was commissioned to develop and premiere a performance as part of the opening season at ICIA earlier this year. The ICIA has supported, nurtured and presented my work over several years now, which has been wonderful and which I feel very grateful for. I was very excited about the opportunity to present as part of the opening season at ‘The Edge’, which promised to be a high profile programme. Indeed, the opening night and weekender, starting the season, generated a lot of attention and acclaim from the arts sector and also amongst the wider public in Bath, in Bristol, as far as London and beyond. After this successful opening, I was devastated to find out that the creative producers, who had been responsible for this fantastic programme, for the opening weekend as well as for the season, had been made redundant. They had been told two weeks prior to the opening celebrations at The Edge and had not mentioned it publicly. As far as I understand, the reason given was that the ICIA will undergo a ‘change in artistic direction’. Why would a change in direction happen just prior to an opening rather than wait for the end of the season, to assess its outcomes and impact? The artists Barry Sykes and Alexander Balanescu, amongst others, are great examples of successful projects initiated by the ‘former artistic direction’, but this is not the direction that will be pursued in the future? The Edge has been purpose-built to accommodate the very programme that had been envisaged by the creative producers, ‘contemporary arts’. It will be interesting to find out how a ‘change in artistic direction’ will be realised in those spaces. It’s not only the programme of fantastic work that will be missed. The ICIA arts commissions were seen as a strong offer for artists to be nurtured, develop new work and interact and collaborate with students and staff from various disciplines at the University. I had for instance conversations and was in exchange with two professors from the Mathematical Sciences department for my commissioned performance project. These opportunities are so important these days, where money for the arts is tight and not many venues can afford to pay for commissions any more. Also it is a unique offer in Britain, and a really clever approach of an arts institution based at a university, to make the most of the university context and support the development of work that engages with various departments and creates interdisciplinary projects. John Struthers states the ICIA will go forward and ‘expand the artist residency programme’ and talks about ‘unparalleled opportunities for artists to develop their practice within an academic and research environment’. I wonder how this will be realised with freelance programmers that are supposed to work for the ICIA in the future, replacing the former creative producers. In order for such a programme to be successful, it is essential to have producers based at the university, with full insight, understanding and contacts within the university’s ecology and social fabric. Let’s see where the development of the ICIA will lead to, however the initial wave of excitement in the arts sector and wider public, about the new building and its offer, has been flattened.

Since the above piece has been published, using my own work at ICIA as an example, I have been asked by a number of people what my opinion is of both this article and the recent developments at ICIA. To begin, I should say I felt immensely lucky to benefit from the long-term support, encouragement and access that my residency at the University of Bath offered. As Sylvia accurately describes above this was a rare and generous opportunity for artists to slowly develop their work with the influence and insight of various academics as well as the highly skilled producers within ICIA. I myself owe a great deal to the then Visual Arts Producer Lindsay Hughes and her assistant Victoria Wastling. So in some ways I am glad of any opportunity that this way of working can be described and promoted, however, I feel I should add my voice to those wishing to clarify the current position. When I heard the shocking news that Lindsay and the equivalent producers in Performance and Music were being made redundant after the new building they had helped devise had opened, I understood this was due to a shift in focus for ICIA. That this would be away from the model of long-term support for open-ended practices, away from the more challenging and contemporary, to a programme that would not require the particular dedication, skill and enthusiasm these producers each offered to audiences and artists (indeed, Lindsay's last day in post was timed to be the day before my solo exhibition of residency projects at The Edge was due to open). Going by the above article it seems as if this is not the case at all, that in fact the new ICIA is hoping to advance the model that Lindsay and her fellow producers worked hard to define, making the reason for their redundancy now as baffling as it was insulting. I rarely got a chance to speak to John Struthers during my time in Bath, but if I am to be an example of not just the past work but also the future ambitions of ICIA I will now write to him personally to ask for a clarification on what is happening and why.

Between 2012-2015 we (LOW PROFILE) worked on a number of projects, commissioned by ICIA, Bath. From a small scale performative intervention as part of a campus freshers week; to a publication with a subsequent book launch event; a large scale public art project and a solo exhibition. Throughout this whole process, at no point were we given a particular status as artists working with this organisation. We were not artists-in-residency, or associate artists. We were just one of a number of artists, with whom, Lindsay Hughes (the creative producer for visual arts) was interested in working with over a sustained period of time. Apart from the loose outline from Lindsay that she hoped to ‘commission something in the Spring’, the invitation was a very open one. There was certainly no promise of multiple commissions, just an offer to ‘do something together’ and to explore what that might be. This type of ‘loose affiliation’ requires a lot of mutual trust, a genuine investment in, and excitement for the generation of new ideas and work - and an acceptance that things might not always turn out exactly as you’d hoped or expected. It is interesting to note, that for us, two of the most significant works we have created in recent years are the last two projects supported by ICIA, and not the first two. This isn’t to dismiss our sense of value of these earlier commissions, but to identify, the fact that this sustained investment has allowed us to make better work, for our practice to mature, and for us to be more ambitious. In many ways, ICIA got the best they could possibly get out of us by being ‘in it’ for the long haul. This type of long-term creative investment in an artist's practice is far from redundant and can simply not be achieved by employing freelance producers on a project-by-project basis.

LOW PROFILE were joined by Lindsay Hughes in the 2nd of a series of LONG CONVERSATIONS around engagement and participation, that discuss details of participatory arts projects by those who make work in this area. In her role at ICIA, Lindsay invited LOW PROFILE to develop a proposal for the project that become Picture In The Paper. Picture in the Paper was a large-scale participatory public art project, commissioned by ICIA for the opening and lifespan of 'The Edge'. http://pictureinthepaper.we-are-low-profile.com/long-converstaion-with-lindsay-hughes-icia/